I found it odd that you would call it an in-bar Maloney when it’s a Komova II. The correct way would be an in-bar shaposhnikova as those types of transitions are all variants of the original Shaposhnikova and a Maloney is specifically just a toe-on shaposhnikova so calling it an in-bar Maloney kind of doesn’t make much sense.
I found it odd that you would call it an in-bar Maloney when it’s a Komova II. The correct way would be an in-bar shaposhnikova as those types of transitions are all variants of the original Shaposhnikova and a Maloney is specifically just a toe-on shaposhnikova so calling it an in-bar Maloney kind of doesn’t make much sense.
LikeLike
Thanks. I’ll make the correction.
LikeLike