One thought on “FIG Men’s Provisional 2024 Code”

  1. Floor:
    Double front with or without 1/2 out same value — this is dumb. I know it’s not a new concept, but it’s dumb.
    No connection for single-salto elements…. jury’s still out on what I think of this, but I’m willing to see how it plays out.

    Rings:
    Azarian to Maltese is only an E? And to planche (significantly harder) is only a D? What on earth is the technical committee smoking?
    I like the upgrade of the swing to inverted cross, though

    Vault groupings seem kind of odd, but I guess it doesn’t really affect much in terms of value or scoring

    P-bars:
    Removal of reverse pirouette seems odd; wonder what the reasoning is?
    Makes sense that double front 1/2 has been devalued; everybody was doing it
    Makes sense to remove circle and flair elements — nobody did them anyway

    High bar:
    I like the change that tkatchev and tkatchev 1/2 are now the same element.
    I like the upgrade of legs-together stalders and the downgrade of yamawaki

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.