gymnastics judging Commonwealth Games

Admiring Gymnastics From Afar is an excellent new blog (now linked under BLOGS in the right hand navigation) by Kary Kleiner from New Zealand.

Actually, Kary also has some posts on there from 2007. She’s back.

In one post she expands on the controversy at Worlds regarding the “Corridor Marking” deduction on Vault.

It sounds like WAG vault judging at Commonwealth Games in Delhi was even worse.

This vault was deducted 0.1 for being “close to the corridor line”.

Imogen Cairns

This one was not deducted:

Gabby May

With the benefit of angle and freeze frame, it’s easy to condemn the judges.

But on podium, from the side, it’s much tougher to see what actually happened in real time.

One and all must agree that the wording “close to the corridor line” must be changed. It’s too vague.

Hopefully they’ll FIX this mistake in the rules at the Feb. 19-21st FIG WAG Technical meeting.

For more examples and videos click over to Admiring Gymnastics From Afar – My Reflections on last year: Part 2 – Judging Confusion

_____

Update from denn333:

in MAG, the deductions for the vault lines are the same as the deductions for FX:
-0.1: one foot or hand over the line
-0.3: more than just one foot or hand over the line
-0.5: landing outside the line

Just Another Opinion asks if there was a “line judge” at that meet?

Published by

Rick Mc

Career gymnastics coach who loves the outdoors, and the internet.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.