She’s getting into the business of advising coaches, parents and gymnasts on the tricky business of American collegiate recruiting. For now, she’s willing to help your gymnast for free.
I’ve been convinced by denn333 to switch to flare as the best spelling:
The word is “flare” — not “flair”. This is probably the most commonly misspelled word in gymnastics, and it’s no wonder: it’s commonly misspelled in English (in general), and the code of points spells it both ways, sometimes even on the same page.
Here’s why: The word “flare” means a “sudden burst” (like a solar flare or a flare of anger) or shapes with a “gradual widening” (like a flared vase). Both of these do a good job at describing the skill, particularly the latter. The word “flair” describes style.
Moreover, while flares can be counted, flair is a non-count noun, like style, happiness, and time. So the sentence “The gymnast did 2 flares” makes sense, but but “The gymnast did 2 flairs” does not.
Of course, flares certainly add flair to a routine. 🙂
For more examples and videos click over to Admiring Gymnastics From Afar – My Reflections on last year: Part 2 – Judging Confusion
_____
Update from denn333:
in MAG, the deductions for the vault lines are the same as the deductions for FX: -0.1: one foot or hand over the line
-0.3: more than just one foot or hand over the line
-0.5: landing outside the line
Just Another Opinion asks if there was a “line judge” at that meet?
Luxembourg 1930 saw the first official apparatus rankings.
Yugoslav Josip Primozic went down in history as the first world champion on floor exercise.
Floor exercises continued to be done on grass even at the 1932 Los Angeles Olympics. Switzerland dominated the world scene in the thirties, not only on floor. 1934 world champion Georg Miez, who placed second in 1930, took the gold on floor in 1936 …
The English and Germans pioneered special floor exercise mats (‘sprung floors’) as early as the twenties as well as the Danes in the thirties
There may be some sort of announcement by Thursday.
NY Times:
When the University of California, Berkeley, announced it was eliminating five varsity teams last fall, the decision was sold as a necessary sacrifice by a university reeling from severe cuts in state aid.
Four months later, the university finds itself in a dilemma caused by a largely overlooked consequence of that decision. The cutting of two women’s teams — lacrosse and gymnastics — threw the Cal athletic department out of compliance with the federal gender-equity law known as Title IX. …