<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: age American gymnasts &#8220;peak&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/2009/11/age-american-gymnasts-peak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/2009/11/age-american-gymnasts-peak/</link>
	<description>tumbling, tramp, diving, acrobatics, circus, cheer, dance, martial arts, X sports ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:31:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alexandrite105</title>
		<link>http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/2009/11/age-american-gymnasts-peak/comment-page-1/#comment-147070</link>
		<dc:creator>alexandrite105</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/?p=11965#comment-147070</guid>
		<description>i do not agree that nastia had two peaks.  i think it might just appear that way because of her ankle injury.  but if you think about it, she was better at 2006 nationals than 2005 worlds with upgraded routines.  in 2007 she was still coming back from her injury.  i think without her injury she would have continued to improve over every year (or maybe 2006/2007 would have been when she peaked).  regardless, to me she really only had one peak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do not agree that nastia had two peaks.  i think it might just appear that way because of her ankle injury.  but if you think about it, she was better at 2006 nationals than 2005 worlds with upgraded routines.  in 2007 she was still coming back from her injury.  i think without her injury she would have continued to improve over every year (or maybe 2006/2007 would have been when she peaked).  regardless, to me she really only had one peak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skyrider 95</title>
		<link>http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/2009/11/age-american-gymnasts-peak/comment-page-1/#comment-147037</link>
		<dc:creator>Skyrider 95</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/?p=11965#comment-147037</guid>
		<description>Until the olympics take place every year witch I doubt will happen, you have to deal with the fact that you might have to wait to meet the requirments to go to the senior level one. But now that they&#039;ve introduced the Youth Olympics they are more likely to get a chance when they&#039;re peaking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until the olympics take place every year witch I doubt will happen, you have to deal with the fact that you might have to wait to meet the requirments to go to the senior level one. But now that they&#8217;ve introduced the Youth Olympics they are more likely to get a chance when they&#8217;re peaking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Thornton</title>
		<link>http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/2009/11/age-american-gymnasts-peak/comment-page-1/#comment-147005</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/?p=11965#comment-147005</guid>
		<description>Skyrider - yes, you&#039;re exactly right about turning 16 by December 31st, but remember that since the Olympics always take place in the summer or fall, there will still be plenty of gymnasts who are post-16 rather than pre-16, and in fact in many cases will be forced to wait until they are 17, 18, or 19.  It doesn&#039;t make any sense.  My main point is the principle rather than exact ages down to the month - we are eliminating so many of the best gymnasts in the world from world competition at not only the best time of their careers, but also the HEALTHIEST time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skyrider &#8211; yes, you&#8217;re exactly right about turning 16 by December 31st, but remember that since the Olympics always take place in the summer or fall, there will still be plenty of gymnasts who are post-16 rather than pre-16, and in fact in many cases will be forced to wait until they are 17, 18, or 19.  It doesn&#8217;t make any sense.  My main point is the principle rather than exact ages down to the month &#8211; we are eliminating so many of the best gymnasts in the world from world competition at not only the best time of their careers, but also the HEALTHIEST time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bm</title>
		<link>http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/2009/11/age-american-gymnasts-peak/comment-page-1/#comment-147004</link>
		<dc:creator>bm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/?p=11965#comment-147004</guid>
		<description>opps, never mind my question. I mixed up the year Nastia was born</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>opps, never mind my question. I mixed up the year Nastia was born</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bm</title>
		<link>http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/2009/11/age-american-gymnasts-peak/comment-page-1/#comment-146999</link>
		<dc:creator>bm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/?p=11965#comment-146999</guid>
		<description>I was a bit confused by Progras at Worlds b/c she was 15, and then heard the above age rule.  Is this age rule new? B/c, I know when Martha and other commentators mention Nastia and 2004, they said she would have been on the team if she was age eligible (but she would have been 16 by Dec 31).  Is this current age rule new, ie post 2004?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a bit confused by Progras at Worlds b/c she was 15, and then heard the above age rule.  Is this age rule new? B/c, I know when Martha and other commentators mention Nastia and 2004, they said she would have been on the team if she was age eligible (but she would have been 16 by Dec 31).  Is this current age rule new, ie post 2004?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TGCoach</title>
		<link>http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/2009/11/age-american-gymnasts-peak/comment-page-1/#comment-146998</link>
		<dc:creator>TGCoach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/?p=11965#comment-146998</guid>
		<description>what is your definition of PEAKING in gymnastics???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is your definition of PEAKING in gymnastics???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skyrider 95</title>
		<link>http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/2009/11/age-american-gymnasts-peak/comment-page-1/#comment-146993</link>
		<dc:creator>Skyrider 95</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gymnasticscoaching.com/new/?p=11965#comment-146993</guid>
		<description>Actually the requirement is that they are 16 by Dec. 31st of that year and therefore if they&#039;re born late in the year they should be peaking right at the time of the Olympics. This only works every four years but no matter what not everyone can go when they&#039;re &#039;peaking&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the requirement is that they are 16 by Dec. 31st of that year and therefore if they&#8217;re born late in the year they should be peaking right at the time of the Olympics. This only works every four years but no matter what not everyone can go when they&#8217;re &#8216;peaking&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
